Find a providerHow it worksThe evidenceThe productFor providersAbout usFAQJournal (soon)
Log inVerixify

You've followed a 5-star recommendation before and been disappointed. That's not a coincidence — it's a business model.

1 in 3
reviews is fake
96%
still read reviews anyway
You can bypass this in two minutes: upload your purchase receipt, read a genuine review.
We're starting from zero. A platform without a mandatory purchase receipt would already have a thousand bought reviews. We'd rather have none than fake ones — and you can be the first to change that.

That's exactly what's not possible with Verix — try it ↓

Calculator: what do fake reviews cost?
5100

Price tier:

CHF 240
Total cost
+0.72
Rating boost (baseline: 3.8 ★ / 20 reviews)

On Verix, reviews without a verified proof of purchase are automatically rejected. Such purchases would be pointless — and manipulation patterns are made visible in the transparency log. The price tiers above are illustrative assumptions, not from a study — only the CHF 8 market-average figure is grounded in a documented case (SRF Data, October 2021: 50 reviews for CHF 400).

The source behind the number.

According to a study by Fachhochschule Worms (2017) roughly a third of all reviews on platforms like Amazon, Tripadvisor, or eBay aren't authentic. For Switzerland, SRF Data confirms this picture: examining around half a million Google Maps reviews, data specialists found thousands of profiles that had to be classified as "highly suspicious".

"A large part is likely attributable to companies that offer such fake accounts and sell positive reviews."

— Lukas Frischknecht, SRF Data — October 2021

"They violate the Unfair Competition Act and are punishable."

— Prof. Florent Thouvenin, University of Zurich — in the same SRF article
→ Read the SRF article

The consequence: whoever trusts a review often trusts a lie. Honest providers lose customers to poor competitors with a bought reputation. Consumers pay for services they would never have chosen otherwise.

In Switzerland, this is already illegal.

Fake reviews violate the Swiss Federal Act against Unfair Competition (UWG). Under Art. 3 para. 1 lit. b UWG, inaccurate or misleading statements about goods, works, or services are prohibited. The Swiss Consumer Protection Foundation actively pursues such practices, and the State Secretariat for Economic Affairs (SECO) publicly documents the legal basis for this.

Purpose of the law (Art. 1 UWG): to ensure fair and undistorted competition in the interest of all parties involved.

→ Legal text at fedlex.admin.ch
Buying or selling fake reviews can lead to criminal charges and damages claims in Switzerland — in 2023, the NZZ confirmed a landmark ruling against a fake-review agency. Swiss Consumer Protection Foundation

The big platforms know — and don't act.

When a platform earns money from review volume, every fake review is revenue — a structural misalignment of incentives, not an isolated failure. Why this conflict of interest can't be solved, and what Verix does differently →

This isn't a Swiss one-off. The European Commission found in a coordinated sweep that 55% of the 223 websites screened were suspected of breaching EU consumer law — for 144 of them (roughly 65%), authorities couldn't confirm that reviews came from real customers. The US FTC issued its own final rule against bought and fake reviews in 2024, and the UK CMA published its own guidance in 2025. Even Amazon — 200 million fake reviews removed worldwide and its own lawsuits against fake-review providers — is fighting a problem that its own platform economics helps create.

Verix makes manipulation structurally costly — and visible.

Problem on other platformsVerix solution
No verification requiredMandatory purchase receipt (OCR, self-hosted)
Fake accounts possibleEmail + verification levels L0–L3
Same IP, many reviewsRate limiting + IP hash (SHA-256)
Incentivised reviewsNLP detection (53 words DE/FR/EN)
Coordinated attacksAnti-cluster (IP, time, writing-pattern analysis)
Opaque scoreBayesian formula public at /transparenz
Uploading fake photospHash duplicate detection + EXIF analysis
US servers, Cloud Act100% Swiss servers (Infomaniak, Geneva)

Sources used

  • Legal text1. Bundesgesetz gegen den unlauteren Wettbewerb (UWG), Art. 1 + Art. 3 (SR 241)fedlex.admin.ch
  • Federal authority & consumer protection2. SECO — Grundlagen zum unlauteren Wettbewerb (laufend)seco.admin.ch
  • Federal authority & consumer protection3. Stiftung für Konsumentenschutz — «Vorsicht vor gefälschten Produktbewertungen» (2020)konsumentenschutz.ch
  • Federal authority & consumer protection4. Stiftung für Konsumentenschutz — «Website-Bewertungen: welche sind vertrauenswürdig?» (laufend)konsumentenschutz.ch
  • Federal authority & consumer protection5. Stiftung für Konsumentenschutz — Themenseite «Unlauterer Wettbewerb (UWG)» (laufend)konsumentenschutz.ch
  • Investigative journalism6. NZZ — «Krieg der falschen Sterne»: wegweisendes Urteil gegen eine Fake-Bewertungs-Agentur (2023)nzz.ch
  • Investigative journalism7. SRF Data — «Google Maps: Frisiertes Rating» (mit rechtlicher Einordnung von Prof. Florent Thouvenin, Universität Zürich) (2021)srf.ch
  • International regulation8. Europäische Kommission — Sweep-Untersuchung: bei 55% der 223 geprüften Websites Verdacht auf irreführende Bewertungen (2022)ec.europa.eu
  • International regulation9. FTC (USA) — Final Rule: Verbot gekaufter und gefälschter Bewertungen (2024)ftc.gov
  • International regulation10. EU-Verbraucherschutzbehörden (CPC) — koordinierter Dark-Patterns-Sweep (2023)commission.europa.eu
  • International regulation11. UK Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) — Fake Reviews Guidance (2025)gov.uk
  • Market research12. Fachhochschule Worms (zitiert in Der Bund) — «Das Geschäft mit den Fake-Reviews» (2017)derbund.ch
  • Market research13. BrightLocal — Local Consumer Review Survey 2025 (2025)brightlocal.com
  • Market research14. Verbraucherzentrale NRW — Untersuchung zu Online-Bewertungen (2018)verbraucherzentrale.nrw (PDF)
  • Investigative journalism15. notebookcheck — Amazon löscht weltweit 200 Millionen Fake-Rezensionen (2024)notebookcheck.com
  • Investigative journalism16. notebookcheck — Amazon klagt in Italien und Spanien gegen Anbieter gefälschter Rezensionen (2024)notebookcheck.com
  • Investigative journalism17. Tages-Anzeiger — «Das Geschäft mit den Fake-Reviews» (Alexandra Scherrer, Carpathia) (n. d.)tagesanzeiger.ch